Political Research Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 1, 49-58 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290305600105

Presidential Persuasion on Social Issues: A Two-Way Street?

Michael Bailey

Georgetown University

Lee Sigelman

George Washington University

Clyde Wilcox

Georgetown University

Although the ability of presidents to mobilize opinion on foreign policy issues is well documented, much less is known about presidents’ abilities to change public attitudes on social and moral issues. We explore the limits of presidential persuasiveness by examining President Clinton’s 1993 proposal to permit gay men and lesbian women to serve openly in the armed forces. Because the issue involved core values and religious beliefs, we might expect Clinton to have been unable to change voter preferences. However, we find evidence of a reciprocal relationship. Clinton’s support for the issue persuaded some members of the public to support the policy, even as it also caused others to think less favorably of him.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
L. R. Olson and A. L. Warber
Belonging, Behaving, and Believing: Assessing the Role of Religion on Presidential Approval
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2008; 61(2): 192 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. P. Haider-Markel and M. R. Joslyn
Beliefs About the Origins of Homosexuality and Support For Gay Rights: An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2008; 72(2): 291 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
D. M. Carpenter II
Presidents of the United States on Leadership
Leadership, August 1, 2007; 3(3): 251 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. W. Stoutenborough, D. P. Haider-Markel, and M. D. Allen
Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2006; 59(3): 419 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]