Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

For more information, click here

Become a Reviewer!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcdermott, M. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections

Monika L Mcdermott

Previous research has demonstrated that in low-information elections voters compensate for a lack of information by taking informational short-cuts, based on candidate cues, to make voting decisions. To date, this research has focused on candidate party identification and incumbency cues. This article argues that candidate demographic cues, specifically race and gender, also play an influential role. Unlike past psychological research that focuses on potential voter bias against women or black candidates, this article examines the informational content of voters' stereotypes about women and black candidates, and how these stereotypes affect voting behavior. I use quasi-experimental data from the Los Angeles Times Poll to demonstrate that candidate gender and candidate race signal voters in two different ways. Voters stereotype candidates ideologically: women and black candidates are stereotyped as more liberal than the average white male. Voters also stereotype candidates on issues: black candidates are seen as more concerned with minority rights than whites; while women candidates are viewed as more dedicated to honest government. As a result, voters choose candidates for office based on how much they agree or disagree with the ideological and issue positions they attribute, through stereotyping, to candidates.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 4, 895-918 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299805100403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
M. J. Streb, B. Frederick, and C. LaFrance
Voter Rolloff in a Low-Information Context: Evidence From Intermediate Appellate Court Elections
American Politics Research, July 1, 2009; 37(4): 644 - 669.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
M. L. McDermott
Religious Stereotyping and Voter Support for Evangelical Candidates
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2009; 62(2): 340 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
L. R. Atkeson and T. B. Krebs
Press Coverage of Mayoral Candidates: The Role of Gender in News Reporting and Campaign Issue Speech
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2008; 61(2): 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
M. McCall
Structuring Gender's Impact: Judicial Voting Across Criminal Justice Cases
American Politics Research, March 1, 2008; 36(2): 264 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
C. Bejarano and G. Segura
What Goes Around, Comes Around: Race, Blowback, and the Louisiana Elections of 2002 and 2003
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 60(2): 328 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
A. K. Stokes-Brown
Racial Identity and Latino Vote Choice
American Politics Research, September 1, 2006; 34(5): 627 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
M. L Mcdermott
Not for Members Only: Group Endorsements as Electoral Information Cues
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2006; 59(2): 249 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
A. W. Barrett and L. W. Barrington
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?: Newspaper Photographs and Voter Evaluations of Political Candidates
International Journal of Press/Politics, October 1, 2005; 10(4): 98 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
C. L. Brians
Women for Women?: Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates
American Politics Research, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 357 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. Dolan
Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2005; 58(1): 31 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. L. Lawless
Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2004; 57(3): 479 - 490.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. L. Lawless
Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2004; 57(1): 81 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
K. Sanbonmatsu
Political Knowledge and Gender Stereotypes
American Politics Research, November 1, 2003; 31(6): 575 - 594.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
E. R. A. N. Smith and R. L. Fox
The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2001; 54(1): 205 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]