Political Research Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to read the PRQ 2007 Annual Reports

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaney, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Nagler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 2, 311-339 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299805100202
© 1998 University of Utah

Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980-1992

Carole Kennedy Chaney

SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY

R. Michael Alvarez

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Jonathan Nagler

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE

This article compares the voting behavior of women and men in presi dential elections since 1980. We test whether the different levels of salience which men and women attribute to different issues or the different pref erences men and women have on issues best accounts for the gender gap. Utilizing theories of different issue emphasis between men and women, we use a multivariate model to demonstrate that a combination of re spondent views on the economy, social programs, military action, abor tion, and ideology can consistently explain at least three-fourths of the gender gap in the 1984, 1988, and 1992 elections. We show that, consis tent with prior research on individual elections, women placed more emphasis on the national economy than men, and men placed more em phasis on pocketbook voting than women. We add evidence showing that women have consistently more negative assessments of the economy than do men, suggesting that a part of what has been considered a Re publican-Democratic gender gap is really an anti-incumbent bias on the part of women. We also clarify the interpretation of partisan identifica tion in explaining the gender gap.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
V. A. Bali
The Passage of Education Citizen Initiatives: Evidence From California
Educational Policy, May 1, 2008; 22(3): 422 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
B. C. Burden
The Social Roots of the Partisan Gender Gap
Public Opin Q, March 1, 2008; 72(1): 55 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
M. C. Banwart
Gender and Young Voters in 2004: The Influence of Perceived Knowledge and Interest
American Behavioral Scientist, May 1, 2007; 50(9): 1152 - 1168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
L. DeSipio and C. J. Uhlaner
Immigrant and Native: Mexican American Presidential Vote Choice Across Immigrant Generations
American Politics Research, March 1, 2007; 35(2): 176 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]