|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Political-Economic Factors Influencing State Medicaid Policy
Colleen M. Grogan
YALE UNIVERSITY
A political-economic theory is developed to explain the formation of public policy in the American states; here, I focus specifically on states' Medicaid policy decisions. I analyze three dimensions of Medicaid policy-financial eligibility, categorical eligibility, and benefit coverage-and argue that each dimension represents a different political process. My theory assumes that state politicians maximize their political utility by attempting to satisfy the preferences of voters, interest groups and their own ideology, while at the same time they minimize their political disutility by attempting to keep the political costs of their actions as low as possible However, I postulate further that the political process varies according to the degree to which consti tuents are interested in the policy, the strength of interest groups, and poli ticians' political ideology. To test this theory, I use a heteroskedastic, timewise autoregressive model for panel data. My theory is fairly well supported by the empirical results: the Medicaid policy dimensions do represent different political processes, and politicians must trade off the utility gained from increasing spending with the utility lost from increasing public expendi tures. However, contrary to my theory, politicians' political ideology plays a significant role in all the Medicaid policy decisions.
Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 3,
589-622 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299404700303

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. O. Choi, S.-S. Bae, S.-W. Kwon, and R. Feiock
County Limits: Policy Types and Expenditure Priorities
The American Review of Public Administration,
January 1, 2010;
40(1):
29 - 45.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. L. Ogden and K. Adams
Poorhouse to Warehouse: Institutional Long-Term Care in the United States
Publius,
December 1, 2009;
39(1):
138 - 163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Keiser and S. M. Miller
The Impact of Organized Interests on Eligibility Determination: The Case of Veterans' Disability Compensation
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory.,
August 14, 2009;
(2009)
mup020v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Gais
Stretched Net: The Retrenchment of State and Local Social Welfare Spending Before the Recession
Publius,
June 1, 2009;
39(3):
557 - 579.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Gray, D. Lowery, and E. K. Godwin
Public Preferences and Organized Interests in Health Policy: State Pharmacy Assistance Programs as Innovations
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law,
February 1, 2007;
32(1):
89 - 129.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Miller
Bureaucratic Policy Making on Trial: Medicaid Nursing Facility Reimbursement, 1988-1998
Med Care Res Rev,
April 1, 2006;
63(2):
189 - 216.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Gilmer, R. Kronick, and T. Rice
Children Welcome, Adults Need Not Apply: Changes in Public Program Enrollment across States and over Time
Med Care Res Rev,
February 1, 2005;
62(1):
56 - 78.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Manza and F. L. Cook
A Democratic Polity?: Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States
American Politics Research,
November 1, 2002;
30(6):
630 - 667.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Kane, R. A. Kane, W. N. Veazie, and R. C. Ladd
Variation in State Spending for Long-Term Care: Factors Associated with More Balanced Systems
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law,
January 1, 1998;
23(2):
363 - 390.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|