|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Partisan-Ideological Divergence and Changing Party Fortunes in the States, 1968—2003A Federal Perspective
Robert D. Brown
University of Mississippi, psrbrown{at}olemiss.edu
John M. Bruce
University of Mississippi, jbruce{at}olemiss.edu
We expand on previous literature on party competition in the American states by examining competition for both state and national offices. We find significant differences in Democratic Party electoral advantage within states, along with across-state variation in changes in these differences over time. We attribute these results to movement in the partisanship and ideology of the states' citizenry. As consistency in these core political attitudes increases, parties are able to campaign and govern on messages that are more consistent across electoral levels. The result is greater consistency in party electoral performance across state and national offices.
Key Words: party competition ideology partisanship federalism
References
- Barrilleaux, Charles J. 1986. A dynamic model of partisan competition in the American states. American Journal of Political Science 30:822-40.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Barrilleaux, Charles, Thomas Holbrook, and Laura Langer. 2002. Electoral competition, legislative balance, and American state welfare policy. American Journal of Political Science 46:415-27.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Barth, Jay. 1992. Dual partisanship in the South. Midsouth Political Science Journal 13:487-500.
- Beck, Paul A. 1997. Party Politics in America, 8th ed. New York: Longman.
- Brown, Robert D., and John M. Bruce. 2002. Political parties in state and nation: Party advantage and party competition in a federal setting. Party Politics 8:635-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bruce, John M., and John A. Clark. 1998. Segmented partisanship in a Southern political elite. Polity 30:627-44.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Bullock, Charles S. III. 1988. Regional realignment from an officeholding perspective. The Journal of Politics 50:553-74.[CrossRef]
- Campbell, James E. 1986. Presidential coattails and midterm losses in state legislative elections. American Political Science Review 80:45-64.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Carsey, Thomas M., William D. Berry, Richard G. Niemi, Lynda W. Powell, and James M Snyder. State legislative election returns, 1967-2003, Release Version 1.
- Ceaser, James W., and Robert P. Saldin 2005. A new measure of party strength. Political Research Quarterly 58:245-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Clark, John, and Brad Lockerbie. 1998. Split partisan identification. In Party activists in Southern politics: Mirrors and makers of change, ed. Charles D. Hadley and Lewis Bowman. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
- Cnudde, Charles F., and Donald J. McCrone. 1969. Party competition and welfare policies in the American states. American Political Science Review 63:858-66.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Converse, Philip E. 1964. The nature of mass belief systems. In Ideology and discontent, ed. David Apter. New York: Free Press.
- Dawson, Richard E., and James A. Robinson. 1963. Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American states. Journal of Politics 25:265-89.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Dye, Thomas R. 1966. Politics, economics, and the public. Chicago: Rand McNally.
- ---. 1984. Party and policy in the states. Journal of Politics 46:1097-115.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1989. Political parties, public opinion, and state policy in the United States. American Political Science Review 83:729-50.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- ---. 1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Garand, James C. 1985. Partisan change and shifting expenditure priorities in the American States. American Politics Quarterly 13:355-91.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Garand, James C. 1988. Localism and regionalism in presidential elections: Is there a home state or regional advantage? Western Political Quarterly 41:85-104.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Gerring, John. 1998. Party ideologies in America, 1828-1996. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Gimpel, James G. 1990. National elections and the autonomy of state party systems. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Hadley, Charles D. 1985. Dual partisan identification in the South. Journal of Politics 47:254-68.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Herrnson, Paul. 1993. The revitalization of national party organizations. In The Parties Respond, ed. Sandy Maisel. New York: Longman.
- Holbrook, Thomas M., and Emily Van Dunk. 1993. Electoral competition in the American states. American Political Science Review 87:955-62.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jennings, Edward T. 1979. Competition, constituencies and welfare policies in the American states. American Political Science Review 73:414-29.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jewell, Malcolm E., and Sarah M. Morehouse 2000. Political parties and elections in American states, 4th ed. Washington DC: CQ Press.
- Keele, Luke, and Nathan J. Kelly. 2006. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis 14:186-205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kessel, John H. 1984. Presidential parties. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
- King, James D. 1989. Interparty competition in the American states: An examination of index components. Western Political Quarterly 41:779-90.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tom W. Rice. 1983. Localism in presidential elections: The home state advantage. American Journal of Political Science 27:548-56.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Maggiaotto, Michael A., and Gary D. Wekkin. 1992. Segmented partisanship in a federal system. Midsouth Political Science Journal 13:425-43.
- Nardulli, Peter F. 1995. The concept of a critical realignment, electoral change, and political behavior. American Political Science Review 89:10-22.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Niemi, Richard G., Stephen Wright, and Lynda Powell. 1987. Multiple party identifiers and the measurement of party identification. Journal of Politics 49:1093-103.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Patterson, Samuel C., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1983. The etiology of partisan competition. American Political Science Review 78:691-707.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Perkins, Jerry, and Randall Guynes. 1976. Partisanship in national and state politics. Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 376-78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Plotnik, Robert D., and Richard F. Winters. 1985. A politicoeconomic theory of income redistribution. American Political Science Review, 79:458-73.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart E. Macdonald. 1986. The power of the states in U.S. presidential elections. American Political Science Review 80:65-87.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Rabinowitz, George, Paul-Henri Gurian, and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. 1985. The structure of presidential elections and the process of realignment, 1944-1980. American Journal of Political Science 29:611-35.
- Ranney, Austin. 1971. Parties in State Politics. In Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis, ed. Herbert Jacob and Kenneth N. Vines. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
- Simon, Dennis M., Charles W. Ostrom, Jr., and Robin F. Marra. 1991. The president, referendum voting, and subnational elections in the United States. American Political Science Review 85:1177-92.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Wekkin, Gary D. 1984. Democrat versus Democrat. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
- Wright, Gerald C., John P. McIver, Robert S. Erikson, and David B. Holian. n.d. Stability and change in state electorates: Carter through Clinton. Xerox.
This version was published on December
1, 2008
Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 4,
585-597 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1065912908317795

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|