Political Research Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craig, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kane, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 4, 579-592 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900407

Winners, Losers, and Election Context: Voter Responses to the 2000 Presidential Election

Stephen C. Craig

University of Florida

Michael D. Martinez

University of Florida

Jason Gainous

University of Louisville

James G. Kane

Florida Voter

Elections are sometimes seen as legitimizing institutions, promoting system-level support among citizens by allowing them to have input into the political process. However, prior research has found that this is less true among supporters of losing candidates, who often exhibit lower levels of political trust and satisfaction with democracy. We analyze NES survey data from 1964 to 2004, as well as surveys from Florida and the nation following the controversial presidential election of 2000, and find that (1) losers exhibit lower levels of political trust, satisfaction with democracy, confidence that government is responsive to citizens, and in early 2001 were less inclined to extend legitimacy to the newly elected president; (2) losers also are more likely to endorse "rationalizations" as explanations of the election outcome, to be less satisfied with the choice of candidates offered in the election, and to perceive the electoral process as unfair; and (3) voter interpretations of the election mediate the relationships between winning/losing on the one hand, and trust, responsiveness, and satisfaction with democracy on the other. These findings suggest that the so-called legitimizing function of elections is far from a universal phenomenon.

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 1998. "Ideological Realignment in the U. S. Electorate". Journal of Politics 60 (August): 634-652.[CrossRef]
  • Alford, John R. 2001. "We’re All in This Together: The Decline of Trust in Government, 1958-1996". In John R. Hibbing and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, eds., What Is It About Government that Americans Dislike?, pp. 28-46. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • American National Election Studies. 2005. The ANES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor]. (www.electionstudies.org). Accessed 8 December 2005.
  • Anderson, Christopher J., Andrè Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory. 1997. "Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems". American Political Science Review 91 (March): 66-81.
  • Anderson, Christopher J., and Andrew J. LoTempio. 2002. "Winning, Losing, and Political Trust in America". British Journal of Political Science 32 (April): 335-351.
  • Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliya V. Tverdova. 2001. "Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies". International Political Science Review 22 (October): 321-338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bennett, W. Lance. 1980. "The Paradox of Public Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Political Accounts". Journal of Politics 42 (August): 792-817.[CrossRef]
  • Botti, Simona, and Sheena S. Iyengar. 2004. "The Psychological Pleasure and Pain of Choosing: When People Prefer Choosing at the Cost of Subsequent Outcome Satisfaction". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (September): 312-326.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Canache, Damarys, Jeffery K. Mondak, and Mitchell A. Seligson. 2001. "Measurement and Meaning in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy". Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (Winter): 506-528.[Abstract]
  • Cappella, Joseph N., and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cigler, Allan J., and Russell Getter. 1977. "Conflict Reduction in the Post-Election Period: A Test of the Depolarization Thesis". Western Political Quarterly 30 (September): 363-376.[CrossRef]
  • Clarke, Harold D., and Alan C. Acock. 1989. "National Elections and Political Attitudes: The Case of Political Efficacy". British Journal of Political Science 19 (October): 551-562.[ISI]
  • Craig, Stephen C. 1993. The Malevolent Leaders: Popular Discontent in America. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Craig, Stephen C., and Michael D. Martinez. 1989. "Perceived Choice and Institutional Support: Limits to Rational Partisanship". Polity 21 (Spring): 606-618.[CrossRef]
  • Craig, Stephen C., Richard G. Niemi, and Glenn E. Silver. 1990. "Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items". Political Behavior 12 (September): 289-314.[CrossRef]
  • Fallows, James. 1996. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Pantheon.
  • Finkel, Steven E. 1985. "Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis". American Journal of Political Science 29 (November): 891-913.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Finkel, Steven E. 1987. "The Effects of Participation on Political Efficacy and Political Support: Evidence from a West German Panel". Journal of Politics 49 (May): 441-464.[CrossRef]
  • Fiorina, Morris P., with Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
  • Freie, John F. 1997. "The Effects of Campaign Participation on Political Attitudes". Political Behavior 19 (June): 133-156.[CrossRef]
  • Ginsberg, Benjamin. 1982. The Consequences of Consent: Elections, Citizen Control and Popular Acquiescence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Robert Weissberg. 1978. "Elections and the Mobilization of Popular Support". American Journal of Political Science 22 (February): 31-55.
  • Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 1992. "The Constructed Explanation: Interpreting Election Results in the 1984 Presidential Race". Journal of Politics 54 (November): 943-976.[CrossRef]
  • Hetherington, Marc J. 1998. "The Political Relevance of Political Trust". American Political Science Review 92 (December): 791-808.
  • Hetherington, Marc J. 1999. "The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote, 1968-96". American Political Science Review 93 (June): 311-326.
  • Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. "Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization". American Political Science Review 95 (September): 619-631.
  • Hibbing, John R., and John R. Alford. 2004. "Accepting Authoritative Decisions: Humans as Wary Cooperators". American Journal of Political Science 48 (January): 62-76.[CrossRef]
  • Hibbing, John R., and James T. Smith. 2004. "Is It the Middle That Is Frustrated? Americans’ Ideological Positions and Governmental Trust". American Politics Research 32 (November): 652-678.[Abstract]
  • Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Joslyn, Mark R., and Allan Cigler. 2001. "Group Involvement and Democratic Orientations: Social Capital in the Postelection Context". Social Science Quarterly 82 (June): 357-368.[CrossRef]
  • Katz, Richard S. 1997. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. "Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation". American Political Science Review 95 (March): 49-69.
  • Kingdon, John W. 1966. Candidates for Office: Beliefs and Strategies. New York: Random House.
  • Kornberg, Allan, and Harold D. Clarke. 1992. Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lind, E. Allan, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
  • Miller, Arthur H., and Ola Listhaug. 1990. "Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States". British Journal of Political Science 20 (July): 357-386.
  • Mutz, Diana C., and Jeffrey J. Mondak. 1997. "Dimensions of Sociotropic Behavior: Group-Based Judgments of Fairness and Well-Being". American Journal of Political Science 41 (January): 284-308.
  • Nadeau, Richard, and Andrè Blais. 1993. "Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect of Participation on Losers’ Consent". British Journal of Political Science 23 (October): 553-563.
  • Nadeau, Richard, Andrè Blais, Neil Nevitte, and Elisabeth Gidengil. 2000. "Elections and Satisfaction with Democracy". Paper presented at the 2000 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association.
  • Norris, Pippa. 1999. "Institutional Explanations for Political Support". In Pippa Norris, ed., Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, pp. 217-235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Price, Vincent, and Anca Romantan. 2004. "Confidence in Institutions Before, During, and After ‘Indecision 2000.’" Journal of Politics 66 (August): 939-956.[CrossRef]
  • Rahn, Wendy M., John Brehm, and Neil Carlson. 1999. "National Elections as Institutions for Generating Social Capital". In Theda Skocpol and Morris P. Fiorina, eds., Civic Engagement in American Democracy, pp. 111-160. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Rasinski, Kenneth A., and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. "Fairness and Vote Choice in the 1984 Presidential Election". American Politics Quarterly 16 (January): 5-24.
  • Schwartz, Barry. 2004. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: Ecco.
  • Sullivan, John L., James Piereson, and George E. Marcus. 1979. "An Alternative Conceptualization of Political Tolerance: Illusory Increases 1950s-1970s". American Political Science Review 73 (September): 781-794.
  • Thomas, Dan B., and Larry R. Baas. 1996. "The Postelection Campaign: Competing Constructions of the Clinton Victory in 1992". Journal of Politics 58 (May): 309-331.[CrossRef]
  • Tyler, Tom R. 1994. "Governing amid Diversity: The Effect of Fair Decisionmaking Procedures on the Legitimacy of Government". Law and Society Review 28 (December): 809-831.[CrossRef]
  • Tyler, Tom R., Jonathan D Casper, and Bonnie Fisher. 1989. "Maintaining Allegiance toward Political Authorities: The Role of Prior Attitudes and the Use of Fair Procedures". American Journal of Political Science 33 (August): 629-652.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Tyler, Tom R., Kenneth A. Rasinki, and Kathleen M. McGraw. 1985. "The Influence of Perceived Injustice on the Endorsement of Political Leaders". Journal of Applied Social Psychology 15 (8): 700-725.[CrossRef]
  • Van Buuren, Stef, and Karin Oudshoorn. 1999. Flexible Multivariate Imputation by MICE. Leiden: TNO Preventie en Gezondheid.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craig, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kane, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?