|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 4,
569-578 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900406
Does National Context Influence Democratic Satisfaction? A Multi-Level Analysis
Jason M. Wells
University of Missouri-Columbia
Jonathan Krieckhaus
University of Missouri-Columbia
Previous research, using standard regression analyses, suggests that national context affects citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. We note that these standard techniques are inappropriate for examining the interaction between national and individual-level data, and we show empirically that these techniques have in fact led to severely biased findings in past studies. We therefore utilize a multi-level model to reassess existing theoretical claims. We find support for the claim that a consensual political system reduces the difference in democratic satisfaction between winners and losers. We do not find support, however, for existing arguments that citizen satisfaction is influenced by economic growth, corruption, democratic longevity, or changes in political freedoms. More generally, we argue that the bias produced by traditional statistical techniques is so severe that scholars must discontinue their use in future research.
References
- Anderson, Christopher, and Christian A. Guillory. 1997. "Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy". American Political Science Review 91: 66-81.
- Bryk, Anthony S., and Stephen W. Raudenbush. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitefield. 1995. "The Politics and Economics of Democratic Commitment: Support for Democracy in Transition Societies". British Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 485-514.
- Gibson, James, L., Raymond M. Duch, and Kent L. Tedin. 1992. "Democratic Values and the Transformation of the Soviet Union". Journal of Politics 54: 329-371.[CrossRef]
- Hox, J. J. 2002. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Lagos, Marta. 1997. "Latin America’s Smiling Mask". Journal of Democracy 8 (3): 125-138.
- Lagos, Marta. 2001. "Between Stability and Crisis in Latin America". Journal of Democracy 12 (1): 137-145.
- Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies; Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
- Morlino, Leonardo, and Jose R. Montero. 1995. "Legitimacy and Democracy in Southern Europe". In Richard Gunther, P. Nikiforos Doamandouros and Hans Jurgen Puhlem, eds., The Politics of Democratic Consolidation, pp. 231-260. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Rose, Richard, William Mishler, and Christian Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and Its Alternatives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Snijders, Tom A. B., and Roel J. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Steenbergen, Marco R., and Bradford S. Jones. 2002. "Modeling Multilevel Data Structures". American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218-237.[CrossRef][ISI]
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
