Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Become a Reviewer!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1065912908319220v1
62/2/257    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beramendi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cusack, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Diverse Disparities

The Politics and Economics of Wage, Market, and Disposable Income Inequalities

Pablo Beramendi

Duke University, pablo.beramendi{at}duke.edu

Thomas R. Cusack

Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, tom{at}wzb.eu

It is widely thought that among the countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), income inequality has become more widespread over the past decades. The authors show that this image is misleading. The OECD countries remain more diverse in their distributions of labor earnings and disposable income than they are in their distributions of market income. The larger and persistent cross-national variation in the distributions of work-related earnings and disposable income is attributable to the role of political actors (such as unions and political parties) as well as economic institutions. The way in which political parties are able to pursue their goals varies across forms of income. Political parties' capacities to shape the distribution of labor earnings is contingent on the degree of wage-bargaining coordination. In turn, political parties directly affect the distribution of disposable income through their choices about fiscal instruments.

Key Words: inequality • redistribution • partisanship • economic institutions • political economy

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 2, 257-275 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1065912908319220


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Socioecon RevHome page
K. Thelen
SASE Annual Meeting 2009, Paris, France: Economic regulation and social solidarity: conceptual and analytic innovations in the study of advanced capitalism
Socioecon. Rev., January 1, 2010; 8(1): 187 - 207.
[Full Text] [PDF]