This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 1065912907309145v1 61/3/390    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Edwards, M. S. Articles by Irvin, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Sins of Commission? Understanding Membership Patterns on the United Nations Human Rights Commission

Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey

Kevin M. Scott

Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C

Susan Hannah Allen

Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas

Kate Irvin

George Washington University, Washington, D.C

A prominent liberal explanation for why states join international organizations is to advance norms that such organizations represent. The authors examine the patterns of membership on the now-defunct United Nations Human Rights Commission (now the UN Human Rights Council). In regions where democratic norms did not hold sway, members were elected to degrade human rights norms. Illiberal states sought seats to shield themselves or neighbors from censure by the Commission. As regions became more democratic, it became harder for states with poor records to be elected and easier for states with better human rights records to be elected.

Key Words: human rights • international organizations • United Nations

This version was published on September 1, 2008

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 3, 390-402 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1065912907309145


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?