This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1065912907306467v1 61/2/219    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Collins, T. Articles by Moyer, L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Gender, Race, and Intersectionality on the Federal Appellate Bench

Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina

Laura Moyer

University of Georgia, Athens

While theoretical justifications predict that a judge's gender and race may influence judicial decisions, empirical support for these arguments has been mixed. However, recent increases in judicial diversity necessitate a reexamination of these earlier studies. Rather than examining individual judges on a single characteristic, such as gender or race alone, this research note argues that the intersection of individual characteristics may provide an alternative approach for evaluating the effects of diversity on the federal appellate bench. The results of cohort models examining the joint effects of race and gender suggest that minority female judges are more likely to support criminal defendants' claims when compared to their colleagues on the bench, even after controlling for other important factors. This suggests that our understanding of judicial behaviors may be assisted by the inclusion of how individual characteristics overlap rather than examining those characteristics alone.

Key Words: judges • gender • race • intersectionality • U.S. courts of appeals • judicial behavior • criminal law

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?