This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1065912907306472v1 61/1/134    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hayes, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Does the Messenger Matter? Candidate-Media Agenda Convergence and Its Effects on Voter Issue Salience

Syracuse University, New York

Though research has shown that candidates and the media can influence the importance voters ascribe to political issues, little work has sought to test the interactive agenda-setting effects of each—in particular, to determine whether the ability of candidates to set the public's agenda depends on the media's willingness to reflect their issue emphases. Using an experiment conducted during the early stages of the 2006 Texas gubernatorial election, the author shows that candidate attempts to influence voter issue salience are most effective when the media focus on the same topics. The findings suggest the value for candidates of enlisting the news media in helping to pass their messages along and serve as a point of departure for more work on the influence of candidate-media agenda convergence.

Key Words: campaigns • elections • agenda setting • news media • issue salience

This version was published on March 1, 2008

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 1, 134-146 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1065912907306472


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?