This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1065912907306761v1 60/4/722    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Karp, J. A. Articles by Garland, M. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Ideological Ambiguity and Split Ticket Voting

University of Exeter

Marshall W. Garland

Texas Tech University

Recent research on congressional elections suggests that voters are more likely to split their votes in ideologically extreme districts. The authors suggest that in this type of context, uncertainty about candidate position rather than clarity explains the occurrence of ticket splitting. Using data from a rolling cross-section campaign survey where two incumbents competed in a predominately conservative district, the authors find that a substantial proportion of voters are likely to have difficulty identifying which congressional candidate was more conservative. Moreover, media exposure contributed to ambiguity over candidate position, which increases the likelihood of ticket splitting.

Key Words: congressional campaigns • elections • rolling cross-section design • Texas

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 60, No. 4, 722-732 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1065912907306761


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?