This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Haider-Markel, D. P. Articles by Lindaman, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Lose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights

University of Kansas, Lawrence

Alana Querze

University of Kansas, Lawrence

Kara Lindaman

Winona State University, Minnesota

Researchers continue to disagree over how minority rights fare in direct democracy elections. The authors enter this debate by reviewing previous research and outlining more systematic criteria for assessing minority rights in the context of direct democracy. In applying these criteria, an analysis of direct democracy contests involving gay and lesbian civil rights suggests that minorities are more likely to lose in these contests. The authors suggest that the conclusions of previous researchers may have been premature and that their criteria should be applied to other minority groups.

Key Words: direct democracy • gay • ballot • minority • Madison

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 60, No. 2, 304-314 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1065912907301984


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. R. Preuhs Descriptive Representation as a Mechanism to Mitigate Policy Backlash: Latino Incorporation and Welfare Policy in the American States Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 60(2): 277 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]