This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lawrence, C. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Of Shirking, Outliers, and Statistical Artifacts

Lame-Duck Legislators and Support for Impeachment

Saint Louis University, Missouri

It has been previously argued that there is substantial evidence that lame-duck Republican members of Congress were less supportive of the impeachment of Bill Clinton than their colleagues who returned in the 106th Congress. The author shows that this conclusion—based on a marginally significant interaction term—is actually the result of two statistical artifacts: the choice of estimator used and the inclusion in the model of five Democratic representatives who voted for some of the articles of impeachment—most notably, Paul McHale of Pennsylvania, the only lame-duck Democrat who supported impeachment. Using the ordered logit estimator (instead of ordered probit, as was previously used), estimating the model with only Republican members included, or excluding an outlier among the Democrats results in the effect becoming statistically insignificant. The long-term evidence of shirking by impeachment supporters is also very limited. On balance, the evidence suggests that retiring Republicans did not engage in shirking when making decisions on whether to vote for impeachment.

Key Words: shirking • impeachment • Congress

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 60, No. 1, 159-162 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1065912906298636


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?