This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vondoepp, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Politics and Judicial Assertiveness in Emerging Democracies: High Court Behavior in Malawi and Zambia

University of Vermont

Focused on High Court behavior in Malawi and Zambia, this article examines the factors affecting judicial assertiveness vis a vis other power-holders in the state. Drawing from strategic understandings of judicial decisionmaking, the analysis focuses on whether and how political factors shape judicial behavior. The findings lend support for those who have emphasized such factors, in particular by indicating that judicial assertiveness is somewhat dependent on larger political conditions. The findings also suggest that the strategic view can be refined. For one, scholars should more directly consider how political factors interact with judicial preferences to shape decisionmaking. Further, scholars should appreciate how political conditions may encourage judges to embrace positions of political neutrality.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 3, 389-399 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900306


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. VonDoepp Context-Sensitive Inquiry in Comparative Judicial Research: Lessons From the Namibian Judiciary Comparative Political Studies, November 1, 2008; 41(11): 1515 - 1540. [Abstract] [PDF]