This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fulton, S. A. Articles by Stone, W. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress

Texas A&M University

Cherie D. Maestas

Florida State University

L. Sandy Maisel

Colby College

Walter J. Stone

University of California at Davis

Do men and women differ in their decisionmaking calculus for higher office? To answer this question, we use a survey of state legislators (SLs) in 1998 to examine the conditions under which male and female SLs seek a position in the U.S. House of Representatives. We consider three ways in which gender may influence ambition and the decision to run—indirectly, directly, and interactively—and we find evidence of all three effects. Female state legislators are less ambitious than males for a U.S. House seat, a difference that largely stems from gender disparities in child-care responsibilities. However, despite their lower ambition, female SLs are just as likely as their male counterparts to seek a congressional position. This apparent puzzle is solved by the finding that the expected benefit of office mediates the relationship between ambition and the likelihood of running. Female SLs are much more responsive to the expected benefit of office than are males, offsetting their diminished ambition level. The sense of a woman is reflected in female state legislators’ increased sensitivity to the strategic considerations surrounding a congressional candidacy. Because men and women respond differently to the intersection of ambition and opportunity, gender constitutes an important, yet often neglected, explanatory variable in the decision-to-run calculus.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 2, 235-248 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900206


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Jensen and W. L. Martinek The Effects of Race and Gender on the Judicial Ambitions of State Trial Court Judges Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2009; 62(2): 379 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Dolan and K. Sanbonmatsu Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender Balance in Government American Politics Research, May 1, 2009; 37(3): 409 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. S. Gartner Secondary Casualty Information: Casualty Uncertainty, Female Casualties, and Wartime Support Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 98 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]