Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nickerson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by King, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan

David W. Nickerson

University of Notre Dame

Ryan D. Friedrichs

Harvard University

David C. King

Harvard University

Political parties have recently rediscovered grassroots tactics for voter mobilization. The only solid evidence for the effectiveness of such get-out-the-vote (GOTV) tactics is based upon non-partisan field experiments that may not accurately capture the effectiveness of partisan campaign outreach. In order to address this lacuna, during the 2002 Michigan gubernatorial election, a large field experiment across 14 state house districts evaluated the cost effectiveness of three mobilization technologies utilized by the Michigan Democratic Party’s Youth Coordinated Campaign: door hangers, volunteer phone calls, and face-to-face visits. Contrary to past non-partisan experiments, our results indicate that all three GOTV strategies possess similar cost-effectiveness.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 1, 85-97 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290605900108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
S. E. Ha and D. S. Karlan
Get-Out-The-Vote Phone Calls: Does Quality Matter?
American Politics Research, March 1, 2009; 37(2): 353 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
C. Panagopoulos
Partisan and Nonpartisan Message Content and Voter Mobilization: Field Experimental Evidence
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2009; 62(1): 70 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
D. W. Nickerson
The Ineffectiveness of E-Vites to Democracy: Field Experiments Testing the Role of E-Mail on Voter Turnout
Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2007; 25(4): 494 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]