Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Become a Reviewer!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jacoby, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Elite Discourse and American Public Opinion: The Case of Welfare Spending

Saundra K. Schneider

Michigan State University

William G. Jacoby

Michigan State University

Popular support for American welfare policies dipped sharply during the mid-1990s. The purpose of this article is to determine why this pronounced, but temporary, shift in public opinion occurred. We use data from the CPS National Election Studies to examine several explanations for temporal variability in citizens’ attitudes toward welfare spending. Our results show that these changes follow similar variations in media content. Individual-level opinion change was also based entirely upon political motivations (e.g., ideology and partisanship) rather than economic beliefs or racial attitudes. We argue that this provides evidence, admittedly somewhat indirect, that elite rhetoric guides and shapes mass opinions.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 3, 367-379 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290505800301
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Public Opin QHome page
J. J. Dyck and L. S. Hussey
The End of Welfare as We Know It?: Durable Attitudes in a Changing Information Environment
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2008; 72(4): 589 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 American Politics ResearchHome page
A. Hetling, M. L. McDermott, and M. Mapps
Symbolism Versus Policy Learning: Public Opinion of the 1996 U.S. Welfare Reforms
American Politics Research, May 1, 2008; 36(3): 335 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Politics ResearchHome page
J. Gainous
Who's Ambivalent and Who's Not? Social Welfare Ambivalence Across Ideology
American Politics Research, March 1, 2008; 36(2): 210 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
P. Goren
The Two Faces of Government Spending
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2008; 61(1): 147 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SexualitiesHome page
A. K. T. Tsang and P. S. Y. Ho
Lost in Translation: Sex and Sexuality in Elite Discourse and Everyday Language
Sexualities, December 1, 2007; 10(5): 623 - 644.
[Abstract] [PDF]