This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sokoloff, W. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Between Justice and Legality: Derrida on Decision

University of Southern California, University of California, Irvine

Recent critiques of Jacques Derrida have misunderstood his contribution to political theory and dismiss his work as apolitical or nihilistic. In contrast to this trend, I argue that Derrida’s concept of decision is the most explicitly political moment of deconstruction. Through readings of "Force of Law" and Politics of Friendship as well as some of his other writings, I argue that Derrida’s re-conceptualization of decision expands the way politics is conceived and enables a robust critique of Rawls’s consensus liberalism. Decision energizes citizenship through strategic interfaces between justice and law and foregrounds respect for others in order to make politics more ethical and lively. Derrida does not paralyze political action by taking the ground away at the moment of action but makes political actors more reflective and responsible by shaking up the stability of all political foundations. Not only have critics of Derrida overstated their case but liberals could learn something from his writings on politics.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 2, 341-352 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290505800213


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?