Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

For more information, click here

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Highton, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rocca, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beyond the Roll-Call Arena: The Determinants of Position Taking in Congress

Benjamin Highton

University of California at Davis

Michael S. Rocca

University of California at Davis

Most analyses of position taking in Congress focus on roll-call voting, where members of Congress (MCs) regularly cast votes, thereby regularly taking positions. Left largely unstudied has been position taking beyond the domain of rollcall voting. However, analyzing non-roll-call position taking raises interesting theoretical questions. Whereas most members cannot avoid taking positions (casting votes) on roll calls, outside the roll-call arena MCs have more discretion; they must decide whether or not to take a position at all. And, while roll-call voting is directly tied to policy consequences, the connection is weaker in non-roll-call position taking. These two distinguishing features of non-roll-call position taking motivate a variety of hypotheses about who takes positions and what positions they take. Our results reveal strong constituency links to both phenomena. The results also imply that party influence is greater on roll-call position taking. We interpret these findings in the context of leading theories of congressional behavior.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 2, 303-316 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290505800210
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
R. A. Clucas
The Contract with America and Conditional Party Government in State Legislatures
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2009; 62(2): 317 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Politics ResearchHome page
M. S. Rocca and G. R. Sanchez
The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Bill Sponsorship and Cosponsorship in Congress
American Politics Research, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 130 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Politics ResearchHome page
M. S. Rocca
Nonlegislative Debate in the U.S. House of Representatives
American Politics Research, July 1, 2007; 35(4): 489 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]