Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

For more information, click here

Become a Reviewer!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawless, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation

Jennifer L. Lawless

Brown University

Gender politics literature stresses the symbolic importance of electing more women to high-level political office. Despite references to the heightened legitimacy that women in politics bring to the political process, and the manner in which they affect constituents’ political attitudes and behavior, little empirical evidence exists regarding the actual benefits of symbolic representation. Using pooled National Election Study data from 1980 to 1998, I attempt to fill a void in the literature, exploring whether the presence of women officeholders affects constituents’ evaluations of their members of Congress, levels of political efficacy and trust in government, and propensity to participate politically. After controlling for party congruence between the representative and his/her constituent, I uncover little evidence of the independent symbolic effects scholars typically ascribe to women’s presence in Congress. Women represented by women tend to offer more positive evaluations of their members of Congress, but this difference does not consistently translate into political attitudes or behavior. The findings represent an initial attempt to use available survey data to explore the extent to which symbolic representation independently affects citizens’ political attitudes and engagement.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 1, 81-99 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290405700107
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
P. Zetterberg
Do Gender Quotas Foster Women's Political Engagement?: Lessons from Latin America
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2009; 62(4): 715 - 730.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. Sanbonmatsu and K. Dolan
Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2009; 62(3): 485 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Politics ResearchHome page
K. Dolan and K. Sanbonmatsu
Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender Balance in Government
American Politics Research, May 1, 2009; 37(3): 409 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
L. R. Atkeson and T. B. Krebs
Press Coverage of Mayoral Candidates: The Role of Gender in News Reporting and Campaign Issue Speech
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2008; 61(2): 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Politics ResearchHome page
B. Frederick
Constituency Population and Representation in the U.S. House
American Politics Research, May 1, 2008; 36(3): 358 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]