Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Culture, Institutions, and Urban Officials' Responses to Morality Issues

Elaine B. Sharp

University of Kansas

This article focuses on city officials' actions when morality issues (gay rights, pornography regulations, etc.) are at stake. Cases drawn from a systematic sample of cities reveal a continuum of local officials' actions ranging from actions unfavorable to activists to evasion of the issue to actions favorable to activists. In order to account for this variation, hypotheses are developed that identify institutional arrangements, ideol- ogy of issue activists, and the community's cultural context as key explanatory concepts. Empirical tests show that (a) officials in cities with more developed counter-cultural elements handle morality issues differ- ently than officials in cities where orthodox/traditional sub-cultural ele- ments dominate, (b) narrower measures of community demand/prefer- ences specific to particular kinds of incidents are less useful in predicting governmental action on these issues, (c) institutions (ward versus at-large council elections; mayor versus city manager executive) are important in mediating the expectations or pressures stemming from the local sub-cul- ture, and (d) official actions vary considerably depending upon the ideo- logical stance and degree of controversiality of issue activists, but this too is contingent on the mediating effects of institutional arrangements.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 4, 861-883 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290205500407
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
J. C. Clinger, R. C. Feiock, B. C. McCabe, and H.-J. Park
Turnover, Transaction Costs, and Time Horizons: An Examination of Municipal Debt Financing
The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2008; 38(2): 167 - 179.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
D. M. West and M. Orr
Morality and Economics: Public Assessments of the Adult Entertainment Industry
Economic Development Quarterly, November 1, 2007; 21(4): 315 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]