Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zorn, C. J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

U.S. Government Litigation Strategies in the Federal Appellate Courts

Christopher J. W. Zorn

Emory University

I examine the decisions of the Department of Justice appellate sections and the Office of the Solicitor General to appeal unfavorable U.S. court of appeals decisions to which the federal government is a party during 1993 and 1994. I hypothesize that factors relating to the cost, reviewability and likelihood of victory in the appeal will be influential in the government's decision, and that the influence of each of these types of factors will vary depending upon the actor making the decision. Multivariate analysis supports these hypotheses, indicating that those factors which have been shown to influence both the Court's decision to grant certiorari and its decisions on the merits also operate in the government's decision to bring an appeal. Overall, my research suggests that the case selection process has a substantial influence on the success of the United States in the federal appellate courts.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 1, 145-166 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290205500106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. Barnes Bowie and D. R. Songer
Assessing the Applicability of Strategic Theory to Explain Decision Making on the Courts of Appeals
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2009; 62(2): 393 - 407.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
C. Nicholson and P. M. Collins Jr.
The Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Strategies in the Supreme Court
American Politics Research, May 1, 2008; 36(3): 382 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]