Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

For more information, click here

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gray, V.
Right arrow Articles by Lowery, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Institutionalization of State Communities of Organized Interests

Virginia Gray

David Lowery

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

We use 1980, 1990, and 1997 data on state lobbying registrations to examine the diversity of interest communities on two dimensions: the range of substantive interests and organizational types represented. The former has remained quite stable over the last two decades while the level of relative institutional representation has increased markedly We replicate and extend Lowery and Gray's (1998) analysis of four theoretical accounts of temporal and spatial variations in levels of the latter-institutional dominance. Only one of their four accounts-one emphasizing the role of interest system density in promoting direct lobbying by institutions-survives these tests. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for interest group politics.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 2, 265-284 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290105400202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
C. A. Kelleher and S. W. Yackee
A Political Consequence of Contracting: Organized Interests and State Agency Decision Making
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2009; 19(3): 579 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
A. van Witteloostuijn and G. de Jong
Ecology of National Rule Birth: A Longitudinal Study of Dutch Higher Education Law, 1960-2004
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., May 27, 2009; (2009) mup004v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
V. Gray, D. Lowery, and E. K. Godwin
Public Preferences and Organized Interests in Health Policy: State Pharmacy Assistance Programs as Innovations
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2007; 32(1): 89 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
D. Lowery and V. Gray
A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2004; 57(1): 164 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]