Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Become a Reviewer!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hojnacki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kimball, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PAC Contributions and Lobbying Contacts in Congressional Committees

Marie Hojnacki

Penn State University

David C. Kimball

Southern Illinois University at Carbondale

Researchers and political observers often assume that campaign contributions help political action committees (PACs) and their affiliated lobbyists gain access to members of Congress. But empirical studies demonstrating that contributions purchase access are extremely rare. In this paper, we compare the degree to which organized interests with PACs have more contact with members of Congress than groups without an affiliated PAC, and we also identify why PAC affiliates might have an advantage in making contact. Our empirical analysis is based on data we collected from a mail survey of lobbyists involved in one of four issues, and campaign finance data we obtained from the Federal Election Commission (FEC). Our analysis indicates that PAC affiliated organizations contacted significantly more undecided committee members than nonaffiliated groups. However, this lobbying advantage derives not from PAC affiliates' contributions but from the base of support these groups have established in congressional districts around the country.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 1, 161-180 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290105400109


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. M. Drope and W. L. Hansen
New Evidence for the Theory of Groups: Trade Association Lobbying in Washington, D.C
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2009; 62(2): 303 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
C. M. Reenock and B. J. Gerber
Political Insulation, Information Exchange, and Interest Group Access to the Bureaucracy
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2008; 18(3): 415 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
K. Kanthak
Crystal Elephants and Committee Chairs: Campaign Contributions and Leadership Races in the U.S. House of Representatives
American Politics Research, May 1, 2007; 35(3): 389 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]