Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spriggs, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hansford, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measuring Legal Change

The Reliability and Validity of Shepard's Citations

James F. Spriggs, II

Thomas G. Hansford

University of California, Davis

With few exceptions, scholars have generally relied on judges' final votes on the menrts as the primary indicator of judicial outcomes. Yet, to fully understand judicial decision-making we think it imperative that research also focus on the interpretation of precedent and legal change. To do so, it is necessary to develop measures of legal change and the treatment of precedent over time. Scholars have begun doing so by using Shepard's Citations, a legal citation index. One of the most important fetures of Shepard's is its list of all opinions that legally treat a previously decided case, as well as its characterization of the nature of that legal treatment. Yet, the reliability and validity of Shepard's is unknown, and we should therefore be appropriately skeptical of it. This article empirically tests the reliability of Shepard's and discusses the validity of its coding protocols. Our analysis demonstrates that Shepard's coding of legal treament is quite reliable, though there is some notable variance across Sheard's treatment categories. We also point out several features of Shepard's that could potentially affect the validity of a measure derived from it. We conclude that, as long as scholars keep these validity issues in mind, Shepard's can be a highly appropriate data source.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 2, 327-341 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290005300206
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 American Politics ResearchHome page
P. C. Corley
Uncertain Precedent: Circuit Court Responses to Supreme Court Plurality Opinions
American Politics Research, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 30 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 POLIT ANALHome page
J. H. Fowler, T. R. Johnson, J. F. Spriggs II, S. Jeon, and P. J. Wahlbeck
Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court
Political Analysis, July 1, 2007; 15(3): 324 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]