Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

For more information, click here

Become a Reviewer!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hart, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Democracy and the Successful Use of Economic Sanctions

Robert A. Hart, JR.

Florida State University

Most analysts argue that economic sanctions are a relatively poor policy tool. In this article I build on a theoretical framework which has the leaders of states being primarily interested in retaining office dometically. Because of this, leaders of some states (i.e., democracies) can effetively tie their hands internationally by using aggressive foreign policy actions. I argue that democracies should be, on average, more successful when using economic sanctions because of the signaling properties of sanctions. This hypothesis is tested using ordered probit analysis of 81 bilateral sanctions episodes from 1914 to 1989. The hypothesis is cofirmed even when controlling for the known correlates of sanctions sucess and other potentially confounding factors (relative power, f. ex.). This finding suggests that we can expand our theoretical expectations on the links between domestic politics and international relations.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 2, 267-284 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/106591290005300203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
S. Chan
Strategic Anticipation and Adjustment: Ex Ante and Ex Post Information in Explaining Sanctions Outcomes
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, June 1, 2009; 30(3): 319 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
S. H. Allen
The Domestic Political Costs of Economic Sanctions
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2008; 52(6): 916 - 944.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
E. M. Hafner-Burton and A. H. Montgomery
Power or Plenty: How Do International Trade Institutions Affect Economic Sanctions?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 213 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. Lektzian and M. Souva
An Institutional Theory of Sanctions Onset and Success
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2007; 51(6): 848 - 871.
[Abstract] [PDF]