Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

More Time With My Money: Leaving The House and Going Home In 1992 and 1994

Harold D. Clarke

Frank B. Feigert

Universiry Of North Texas

Barry J. Seldon

Marianne C. Stewart

University Of Texas At Dallas

Before the 1992 congressional elections, 66 members of the House of Representatives retired -the highest number since the end of World War II. Fully 53 of the 1992 retirees did not seek another elective office. Previous studies of the retirement surge have emphasized a combination of adverse political circumstances, including the House banking scandal that lessened offenders' reelection prospects, and unique financial opportunities for some members created by a combination of pension monies and convertible campaign funds. This article argues that the 1992 political context was such that, although retiring members in both parties were susceptible to the lure of spending "more time with their money," the bad-check scandal affected only Republicans, not Democrats. Check-kiting members in both parties who decided to run and were reelected in 1992 factored this information into their 1994 retirement decisions as evidence of electoral strength, not weakness. In 1994, as in 1992, anticipated retirement income was equally attractive to both Democrats and Republicans.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 1, 67-85 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299905200103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
C. W. Bonneau and M. G. Hall
Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections: Context and the Politics of Institutional Design
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2003; 56(3): 337 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. L. Bernstein and J. Wolak
A Bicameral Perspective on Legislative Retirement: The Case of the Senate
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2002; 55(2): 375 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]