Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

For more information, click here

Become a Reviewer!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sebastien Rioux, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

International Crises and Linkage Politics: The Experiences of the United States, 1953-1994

Patrick James

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

Jean Sebastien Rioux

UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTREAL AND McGILL UNIVERSITY

This study assesses the effects of U.S. involvement in international cri ses on the domestic popularity of American presidents for all major classes of voters. Using a time series analysis of monthly presidential approval and crisis involvement between 1953 and 1994, and controlling for eco nomic conditions and structural features of presidential popularity, it is apparent that crisis activity does increase the president's popularity, albeit by a very small margin. This result holds for both overall approval levels and within each president's "ruling coalition" of partisans as well as inde pendent voters; opposition party voters generally do not "rally 'round the flag." The small rally effect for crisis activity diminishes, however, when the U.S. president uses force, and when the Soviets are not involved. Furthermore, the rally effect actually seems to depend on the level of presidential response to a crisis; higher levels of response would account for rally effects. Taking the analysis one step further, it is revealed that outcomes of international crises (that is, how the U.S. fared) generally do not affect presidential popularity, even when examined with various lags. The investigation concludes with suggestions for further research on link age politics.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 3, 781-812 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299805100311


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
P. Arena
Success Breeds Success? War Outcomes, Domestic Opposition, and Elections
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 136 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
Z. Maoz and R. M. Siverson
Bargaining, Domestic Politics, and International Context in the Management of War: A Review Essay
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 171 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. B. K. Potter
Does Experience Matter?: American Presidential Experience, Age, and International Conflict
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2007; 51(3): 351 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
INT RELAT ASIA PACHome page
G. A.M. Davies
US Presidential popularity and opportunities to coerce North Korea: a quantitative test 1990 2000
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 129 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]