This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thorson, G. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Divided Government and the Passage of Partisan Legislation, 1947-1990

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AT MORRIS

Recent literature has provided some evidence that the presence of di vided government does not affect the amount of significant legislation passed by Congress and enacted into law (Mayhew 1991). In this article, I argue that although there may not be a difference in the absolute num ber of bills passed during unified and divided periods, there nevertheless may be an important difference in the formation of coalitions¹ during divided and unified periods. Specifically, I argue that party unity votes that favor the dominant party ² are more likely to form on final votes of passage during periods of unified government. I use regression analysis and probit analysis to determine if there is empirical support for this hypothesized difference in coalition formation. I find that the presence of unified government significantly increases the likelihood that a bill will pass through Congress with a party unity vote favoring the dominant party The estimates are statistically significant for both the House and the Senate.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 3, 751-764 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299805100309


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?