Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

For more information, click here

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by La Cour Dabelko, K.
Right arrow Articles by Herrnson, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Women's and Men's Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives

Kirsten La Cour Dabelko

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

Paul S. Herrnson

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

Widely proclaimed as the "Year of the Woman," 1992 resulted in the election of more women members of Congress than any other election in U.S. history. Using campaign data collected from a survey of 1992 House candidates and campaign aides and campaign finance data, this study ap plies theories of campaign convergence and divergence to the study of women's and men's bids for public office. It demonstrates that there are more similarities than differences in the campaigns of female and male candidates. Women and men give similar reasons for running for Con gress, assemble comparable campaign resources, and employ similar strat egies and communications techniques. Men and women also give similar assessments of the strengths and weaknesses of their own and their opponent's campaigns and hold similar perceptions of how the electoral process works. Where they disagree is on substantive issues. Women are more likely than men to campaign on social issues. This study shows that both the convergence in campaign styles and the divergence in issues help to explain the success rates achieved by female candidates in recent elections.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 1, 121-135 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299705000106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
L. R. Atkeson and T. B. Krebs
Press Coverage of Mayoral Candidates: The Role of Gender in News Reporting and Campaign Issue Speech
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2008; 61(2): 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
S. Jenkins
A Woman's Work Is Never Done? Fund-Raising Perception and Effort among Female State Legislative Candidates
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 60(2): 230 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. Dolan
Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2005; 58(1): 31 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]