Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whiteley, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rational Choice and Political Participation — Evaluating the Debate

Paul F. Whiteley

COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY AND UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND

This paper evaluates rational choice models of political participation both at the theoretical and empirical levels. The theoretical discussion is con cerned with evaluating attempts which have been made to circumvent the paradox of participation-the proposition introduced by Mancur Olson that rational actors will not get involved in collective action in order to achieve common goals. The analysis suggests that the paradox is more of an intrac table problem for rational choice theory than is commonly recognized. The empirical section of the paper uses data from the first national survey of Conservative party members in Britain to model the determinants of political activism. It tests rational actor models against an alternative "general incen tives" theory of participation which includes variables that are not consis tent with rational choice theory. The conclusion is that while a rational choice model gives great insights into political participation, it provides an in complete account of participation, and by implication this may be true of such models in other areas of political science.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 1, 211-233 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299504800112


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
J. R. Kluegel and D. S. Mason
Political Involvement in Transition: Who Participated in Central and Eastern Europe?
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, March 1, 1999; 40(1): 41 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
T. G. Jelen
Research in Religion and Mass Political Behavior in the United States: Looking Both Ways After Two Decades of Scholarship
American Politics Research, January 1, 1998; 26(1): 110 - 134.
[Abstract]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. E. Leighley
Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives: A Field Essay on Political Participation
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 1995; 48(1): 181 - 209.
[PDF]