This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kahn, K. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Incumbency and the News Media in U.S. Senate Elections: An Experimental Investigation

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

Although our understanding of voting in Senate elections has increased considerably over the past decade, the exclusive reliance on survey data has limited the range of questions we have explored. Using a less traditional design, the present study expands our understanding of vote choice in Senate elections. This study combines two methods-a content analysis and an experiment-to examine the impact that news coverage and candidate status have on voters views of Senate candidates. The results of this study suggest that both campaign coverage and the candidate's status favor incumbents. First, current patterns of campaign coverage encourage people to develop more favorable impressions of incumbents. Second, people use incumbency as a cue to draw distinctions between identical incumbents and challengers, and these distinctions always favor incumbents.

Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 4, 715-740 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/106591299304600402


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Squire Candidates, Money, and Voters-Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 1995; 48(4): 891 - 917. [Abstract] [PDF]