Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Political Research Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Unpacking Agenda Control in Congress: Individual Roll Rates and the Republican Revolution

Jamie L. Carson1, Nathan W. Monroe2, and Gregory Robinson3*

1 The University of Georgia
2 University of California, Merced
3 Binghamton University (SUNY)

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: grobinso{at}binghamton.edu.


   Abstract
The twelve years following the Republican revolution provide ideal ground to test existing theories of congressional behavior and organization.The authors examine the incidence of individual roll rates in the U.S. House to "unpack" the degree to which the 1994 election produced a change in agenda control and examine how it affected roll rates.Then,to understand differences in agenda control, we compare majority and minority party roll rates before and after the election. The results confirm majority party influence over the House agenda and show that the Republican leadership exhibited remarkably similar behavior to the Democrats prior to 1995.

First published on August 31, 2009
Political Research Quarterly 2009, doi:10.1177/1065912909343579


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?