The Impact of the Australian Ballot on Member Behavior in the U.S. House of Representatives
Jill N. Wittrock,
Stephen C. Nemeth,
Howard Sanborn,
Brian DiSarro,
and
Peverill Squire*
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: squirep{at}missouri.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Katz and Sala linked the development of committee property rights in the late-nineteenth-century U.S. House of Representatives to the introduction of the Australian ballot. If, as they posited, members sought personal reputations to carry them to reelection in the new electoral environment, the current article argues that behaviors with more immediate political payoffs also should have changed in ways their theory would predict. The article examines whether committee assignments, floor voting behavior, and the distribution of pork barrel projects changed in predicted ways and finds supportive outcomes, but usually only when the office bloc ballot, and not the party bloc ballot, was in use.